Features | Blogs | Videos | Calendar | Advertise Friday, July 30, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010

Is High Speed Rail Coming to Hampton Roads?

During the last two Congressional recesses when national government leaders went home, it was the health care question that dominated town hall meetings and congressional presentations.

The second most talked about topic was high speed rail, and the importance of this subject is simply destined to grow, maybe slowly, but also maybe rapidly.

high-speed-railThe reasons are many.

First, consider scope and recall the mid-’50s of the last century when President Eisenhower launched what we now call the Eisenhower Interstate Highway system, and imagine that we may now be at the beginning of an Interstate High Speed Rail system. The Interstate Highway system was a game-changer for the nation and the localities it served. It required massive investments and some 30 years to complete. It spawned countless technologies, enabled Americans to see places that they had only dreamed of and much more. Today, President Obama, aided by the spadework of recent years has placed actual dollars on the table and has launched an Interstate Railroad system. It is likely that the scope of the Interstate High Speed Rail system will have no less long-term impact.

Second, consider the potential inevitability of the High Speed Rail idea. Airports are full and maybe peaked out, and air travel is expensive and becoming less attractive. Aggravating automobile congestion is now commonplace and everywhere. In many, many parts of the nation, it has become untenable; witness here, the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel every morning and every afternoon. Most leaders today recognize we cannot pave our way out of congestion. Foreign oil costs are both rising and harming our national import-export accounts. Something has to change, and that something just might be the arrival of High Speed Rail and sooner rather than later.

Indeed, for Hampton Roads, major High Speed Rail questions will confront us very, very soon. Are you ready to advance your druthers? If not, who will? As is always the case, we need to brush up and get ready.

And yet we also need to realize that it will take 15-20 years to complete the entire high speed rail build-out. This rather means that it is especially important for the 40-year-olds and the Generation X / Y citizens to plug in, study the issues and to muster and advance our best-possible professional and commonsense opinions.

Quality and solid input reflecting the projected needs from all areas of interest–arts, business, ports, tourism, personal travel, military, homeland security, shipyards, culture, etc.–as they concern Hampton Roads must be advanced for two reasons.

Now, more than ever, is the time to get on track.

Now, more than ever, is the time to get on track.

First, the feds need to know what we need and want. It must be multi-faceted to reflect broad need and value. It must reflect our passion. And it must consider the next generation and their lifestyles.

Second, the feds need to see and feel genuine and committed interest, or they will simply work on the Greater Tulsa, Tampa Bay, Little Rock Region or Duluth Metro areas first. This is no time to go to sleep.

This will be the first in a series of AltDaily articles that we will run on almost a daily basis up to January 28 in order to better inform us all on the imminence and importance of high-speed rail.

There will be no solar eclipse on January 28, but on that day and as directed by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) the third Public Hearing on the Rail to Hampton Roads (R2HR) Project will be conducted here in Norfolk. Specifically, the Public Hearing will address the Alternatives Analysis and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)* that was released last December 18.

Our near daily High Speed Rail blog articles will address pros and cons, explain the federal process, tell you what’s good and what needs to be added to the EIS (for your good), and tell you how to make inputs into the process and into the public record**.

Be warned; this is a most complex topic. The competition, nationwide, to be funded first or at least early will be fierce and ultra-intense. Hampton Roads will need well-grounded reasoning and support.

How we should be traveling.

How we should be traveling.

Timeline, with important coming events in bold:

2004 – Year in which studies commenced for the Rail to Hampton Roads Project

December 18 – FRA released the Alternatives Analysis and Draft EIS

20 January – Future of Hampton Roads sponsors a Town Meeting at Granby Theater

26 January – Public Hearing in Richmond

27 January – Public Hearing in Newport News

28 January – Public Hearing in Norfolk

11 February – End of public comment period; written inputs must be received

1 March (pure estimate) – the Commonwealth makes its input on what will be the Final EIS (FEIS)

Summer 2010 (pure estimate) – USDOT approves and FRA issues the FEIS

*The EIS (7 Chapters, 625 pages) can be found at: http://www.drpt.virginia.gov/projects/hamptonpassenger.aspx.

**Over the course of our series, we’ll be providing info on how to communicate your input. But if and whenever you’re ready to do so, here are a few simple ways to go ahead:

  • Electronic form comments to VDRPT (5 pages, 6 questions, excellent procedure): http://www.rich2hrrail.info/. Click “Comment on Draft EIS” at the bottom of page (take your time; do it well).
  • Written comments to: VDRPT, Public Info Office, DRPT, 600 E. Main St, Suite 2102, Richmond, VA 23219.
  • Verbal comments at the public hearing: From the floor, if called upon (three minutes max, limited numbers). Or to the on-site VDRPT Stenographer/Recorder.

There will be a Town Hall Meeting in support of the event on 1/20 at the Granby Theater at 5:30. Mark your calendars.

Filed Under: Features : News : Politics
Bookmark and Share

COMMENTS

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Facebook comments:

  • Thom White | January 14, 10 @ 3:07 pm

    Everyone, PLEASE attend as many of these meetings as possible. Bring your friends, family, coworkers, neighbors. A real connection to a nationwide High Speed Rail system will benefit the area in ways that we can’t even anticipate at this time. Imagine what will happen when we are no longer the quiet end of a series of difficult dead-end roads.

  • Chris | January 14, 10 @ 4:01 pm

    FOR ALL FUTURISTS: This High Speed Rail Town Meeting on the 20th at the Granby Theater (5:30) is going to be most educational, so that everyone will be armed to the teeth for the public comment meetings with the Feds on the 27th and 28th. Besides being packed with useful information, It is going to be fun…and hey….will give you an excuse to get your Hump Day Happy Hour started early. BE THERE!

  • Missy Schmidt | January 14, 10 @ 5:24 pm

    You are SO right about this being an under-40 issue for usage due to the build-out timing. However, it is also an issue for anyone who wants to see the Hampton Roads region be a region be more impactful on a national level! Thanks for getting the word out! :-)

    We’ve shared a lot about it on the regional blog, http://smartregion.org/index.php?s=high+speed+rail … oh, and the Hampton Roads Economic Development Alliance unveiled their new logo and tagline today at the Annual Meeting. Their website will be updated within 2 weeks.

    Whatcha think? “Hampton Roads, the heart of the Mid-Atlantic”

  • Immy | January 15, 10 @ 8:49 am

    Many good points, and I’m a big supporter of high speed rail. One note, however – comparing rail to air is not a good idea. Rail generally loses, big time. Just a quick example:

    A week long Norfolk to Pittsburgh trip (M-F)

    AIR (from Norfolk) – $172, maybe 9 hours of travel time with layovers. Add a few hours for TSA silliness, and it takes maybe 14 total hours of travel.

    RAIL (from Newport News) – $114, but a whopping 32 hours of travel time. Even if we bumped up to true “high speed” rail, this will be double the time.

    Regardless, I think it’s a fantastic idea, and one that needs to be started ASAP.

  • lizzelizzel | January 15, 10 @ 9:10 pm

    I’m selfish. I want high speed rail and I want it now!

  • Eric | January 19, 10 @ 10:57 am

    Immy:

    You might be right for long-haul trips, but comparing high speed rail to air travel works for shorter trips. Take the DC-NY corridor for example: Many travelers choose to take the Acela Express from DC to NY, even though the travel time might be longer (although the amount of time that a traveler would have to take to go to an airport in DC an hour before his flight, fly an hour to an airport in NY, and travel into the city might be pretty close). In that situation, the convenience of having a way to travel from one center city to another, without having to deal with the headaches of air travel, outweighs the possible lower cost and shorter travel times of air travel.

  • Joanna | March 22, 10 @ 8:44 pm

    I believe in railroad.

Post a comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

ABOUT THE WRITER

Hannah and Jesse edit this site during the rare moments when Jesse isn't working on the boat he's going to sail around the world and Hannah's not screaming like The Banshee.
Other posts by Editors | Publishers.