Features | Opinion | Videos | Calendar | Advertise Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Not Guilty

This is not a novel pop culture philosophy quandary, but it is one that keeps coming up.  It came up last night at the Boot, actually.  It has to do with the search for outward cues to find self-definition.

I have not believed in “guilty pleasures” for years.

It is easy to overcomplicate the murky waters of cultural snobbery.  It is a shorthand many young people use to define themselves.  Thankfully, we have aged out of middle school and the vicious circle of treachery that happens there.  I’m thinking of Dawn Weiner in Todd Solondz’ remarkable Welcome to the Dollhouse.  The movie captures some universal memories too ugly for most entertainment to mention, particularly the anxiety and hostility of trying to find a seat in the cafeteria.

While we don’t indulge in such naked depravity in social situations anymore, there are many ways we use cultural referents to identify the person we want to think of ourselves as.  Pop culture appreciation and derision has become to different degrees a method of self-segregation.  “This stuff” is what me and my people are into and “that stuff” is what others are into.

This sounds paranoiac but I’m convinced it’s real, albeit rarely so calculated or overt.  More often, it is something that sneaks into our beings unnoticed, but there are symptoms you might relate to.  What do we express when we abashadly call something a “guilty pleasure?”  I think we are saying something along the lines of:

“I’m aware that this is something I’m not supposed to like based on the cultural biases I have imposed upon myself, but for some strange reason I enjoy it.”

While such reflection usually comes out in rather frivolous conversation, the implications seem deeply sad to me.  Why should anybody feel shame for liking something?

This is not an excuse to lapse into “everything’s okay” apathy.  I’ve been told there are people who can live without obsessive interaction with pop culture, and live happy, fulfilling, productive lives.  I just don’t relate.  I believe in the validity of way out of proportion passion for pop ephemera.  Love and hate and everything in between.

What do I love?  Lots of things, today it has been Prince more than anything else.  What do I hate?  “Out of the Box”.  It’s a beloved local new music program on 89.5 that plays thousands of tunes you will never hear anywhere else on the dial.  There’s no rational reason to hate it, it seems to serve a valuable service on the dial, and I know plenty of lovely, intelligent people who treasure it.

I should probably just leave it alone and accept it as benevolent program that fails to tickle my boat.  That can’t erase a visceral loathing that wells up within me when I’ve tried to listen (I’m to understand many people feel something similar listening to corporate, commercial radio).  This is a dangerous rant I’ll save for another day, but the ultimate feeling is of a program that subverts it’s espoused goals of being a showcase for new, underexposed music to a deeply fearful refusal to play anything that might offend or alienate an average old white heterosexual male.

The thing is I get anxious in expressing my displeasure with the program, because there is a tacit agreement among many people I come across that it is one of the best things on the radio.  I used to get this a lot and would go the cowardly route of grinding my teeth, smiling, and just barely avoiding lying with rote factual statements.

“Yeah, they do play a lot of music you won’t hear anywhere else.”

So “Out of the Box” was a guilty displeasure of mine, and I’ve had to push through that, even if I get labeled a hater once again.  I made a nastier version of this point on a comments thread earlier, and got a reply favorably comparing “Out of the Box” to stations that play Nickelback and “Hollaback Girl” incessently.

I love “Hollaback Girl” and I’m not the slightest bit guilty about it.  I hate Nickelback with a similar lack of guilt.  Loving and hating pop objects is wonderful, and I do believe it teaches us about ourselves.  The thing to be suspicious about is when you catch yourself liking or disliking things because you feel you’re supposed to.  That is when there is an external pressure you’re taking too seriously, and it just might say some ugly things about your attitudes towards culture and the population that consumes it.

And say nasty things.  Don’t be afraid, and don’t require the validation of others.  But please make sure it is a conclusion you’ve arrived at rather than following a subcultural program.  Don’t dare feel superior to another person because of the magazines you subscribe to.  Fcuk guilty pleasures and fcuk good taste.  Follow your muse and don’t let anybody make you feel bad about it.

Bookmark and Share

COMMENTS

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Facebook comments:

  • Alfredo Torres | May 13, 09 @ 6:44 pm

    Interesting blog George. I have to tell you that uit surprises me to hear that from a member of the hipster/scenester community, where many memebers of that scene hate stuff just because they are suppost to hate it. I will never forget being in Richmond with some friends of mine sitting across from a bunch of hipsters. We were talking about music when I mentioned my love of the band Govt Mule, (one of the best “Jam Bands” ever). One friend said that I shouldnt talk about them in this particuler place because of what the hipsters would say. Sure enough, when our conversation was overheard, the comments about how much the band sucked began. Why? Because they werent some indie no one knows about band or some sudo-intellicual hip hop group. The funny thing is that I wold bet my paycheck that they never even heard of Govt Mule.
    Still, very interesting and I agree 100%

    Wow, that might be the second time you and I have agreed on something.

    THe end is near.

    Torres

  • Jerome Spencer | May 14, 09 @ 1:51 pm

    Torres just agreed with you and called you a hipster/scenester simultaneously. That’s a guilty pleasure right there.

  • George Booker | May 15, 09 @ 3:10 pm

    not guilty.

    just delicious.

    i think i’m pro-torres in any non-political conversation.

  • Brendan Kennedy | May 17, 09 @ 12:03 pm

    You’ve ignited my Catholic guilt and made me feel guilty for still having guilty pleasures even though I know I shouldn’t feel guilty.

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

ABOUT THE WRITER
George Booker is writing this about himself in the third person. He was considering second person, maybe making this the "Bright Lights, Big City" of bios. He was looking into casting Micheal J. Fox in the forthcoming film adaptation, as the disabled actor would likely portray him with ample charm, sympathy, and fifty-something boyish handsomeness. Recently, however, Booker has realized that only Anne Hathaway or Chiwetel Ejiofor could really capture his essence. Late 20s, Norfolk raised music writer. Former DJ and production head for WVFS Tallahassee, former staff clerk at defunct Norfolk music stores DJ's and Relative Theory. Current Film Editor and Contributor to No Ripcord Magazine, contributed blurbs to Link and Port Folio Magazine.
Other posts by .