If You Read the Paper | Wednesday April 20

Words

Happy 4-20 Everyone!

Last week, I awoke at 5 am (that’s right folks, sometimes when I forget to link to something or have a typo, please bear with me and remember that I generally read the paper and respond before the sun comes up.) This particular morning, I hopped on my high horse (I like to call her Amanda) and spat out a few reasons why I considered guns to be bad. This is in direct opposition to a more common American theme, in which guns are thought of as good.” I got some feedback. Some fair and balanced (Five For Fighting, whoever you are, nicely done), some not at all. To Joshua Shelly, whom I applaud for publicly stating his opinion, I applaud nothing else. In my statement, I tried to place myself in the shoes of someone trying to obtain a firearm without a background check and realized I’d have no clue how to do so unless I went to a gun show. Shelly explained to me, If you want to get a gun the “Ghetto way” all you need to do is slip a homeless person a 5 spot and ask him if he knows anyone. Chances are he smokes crack, and his crack dealer will know exactly where to go. Carrie Bartkowiak, who stuck more to logical argument wholly oppositional to my own, attempted to make my position about government control. She asked why those of us in opposition don’t just do something on our own without getting the government involved. Later in the week, one of my lifetime personal goals was fulfilled when Friday IYRTP columnist John McManus linked to my piece and called it “moving.” To these and the rest who responded, in the immortal words of Jules Winnfield: allow me to retort.

The good kind of guns.

Shelly: To stereotype the ghetto keeps the ghetto down, friend. This applies to guns, crack smoking, and pretty much everything else you may think regarding the disadvantaged among us.

Bartkowiak: I’m so sorry you’ve experienced violence firsthand. However, your suggestion of banning all potential murder and maiming weapons might not work. Knives, bats, and pencils are all used in daily, non-violent activities (cooking, little league, illicit 6th grade love note passing) to the extent that we cannot abolish them, I’m afraid. I figure you know this and were being facetious. Guns serve no life-enriching purpose other than violence (I’m leaving hunting out of this specific comment, as I think there’s wiggle room there.)

Nowhere did I say guns should be abolished. They can’t be. Hunters and Civil War reinactors would freak. But seriously, all I said was the idea of having gun shows follow the same regulations as traditional retail firearm outlets sounds like a good idea. Making the purchase procedure of something that powerful and lethal the same across the board is common sense, not communism?

Just yesterday, a kindergartner in Texas brought a gun to school and accidentally shot three classmates. Luckily everyone survived. Also, as the initial story was in response to the upcoming anniversary of the Virginia Tech massacre, I’m also linking to a well-done, balanced, and inspirational piece on those who survived (all graduated!)

4/20 Buzzzz

Legalization is wanted.

Moving on from my hippie child guns-are-bad rant, I’m going to further the stereotype and wish everyone out there a Happy April 20! Somehow I’ve ended up getting this most wonderful day of the year at IYRTP two years in a row, which is certainly a higher power at work and not merely coincidence.

Currently there are bills to legalize marijuana or politicians speaking out in support in Maine, Florida, and Oregon, among others.

PEW Resesarch Center just released a graph showing continuous growing support of legalization since 1990.

C’mon Cooch! What say you? Legalize it 2012?

Spank That!

Henry Allen Fitzsimmons, owner of Envy Bar and Grill on the Va Beach strip, is being held without bond on charges he wouldn’t allow two young ladies to leave his hotel room until they agreed to be spanked. Come on, dude.

Ride That Bus, Then That Train?

The Daily Press is reporting HRT bus ridership is way up, bucking national trends which say bus ridership is in decline. Just last week, I was, admittedly, a little discouraged about light rail. It’s late, it’s expensive, it’s not going to go to Virginia Beach or ODU. I read in Veer (sorry, no online link that I could find) that the old Norfolk trolleys followed Granby Street from downtown by Hell’s Kitchen all the way to Ocean View and was immediately caught up in the “what if” of that happening again. I mean, a lot of people live within walking distance of Granby.

So hearing that our population is, in general, more open to public transportation than other areas gives me hope that the “little train that could,” will. Ridership equates dollars which equates expansion. HRT’s chief of planning and development, Ray Amoruso, reasons that rising gas prices have something to do with the estimated 1 million additional riders over last year.

To that, I respond with a heck yes! I don’t particularly enjoy the expensive fill-up every time I’m at the pump either. However, it makes me think longer about whether I even *need* the car. Can I walk or bike there? Can I wait until I need to do several errands and only make one car trip? Can I take public transportation? If all environmental or community reasons to reduce vehicle travel won’t be listened to with any seriousness, I’m glad to see cold hard cash making a dent in all this pollution.

Park Place Update:

Local LEED builders GreenBuildIt have officially launched their new website. Off the success of their first green home in Park Place last year, this Friday, they are hosting Not Your Usual House Tour 2.0, showcasing the second green home they’ve built (and sold!) in Park Place. If you’ve been reading about this historic, friendly, in-need-of-help neighborhood but haven’t ventured out to see what it’s all about yet, this is the perfect, perfect opportunity.

"
"
Bookmark and Share

COMMENTS

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Facebook comments:

  • non-fb Sean | April 20, 11 @ 11:05 am

    Cooch can’t just arbitrarily legalize it. The GA has to take the first step, and McDonnell has to sign it. Regardless, won’t be happening this year, with the legislative session done when it comes to new business.

    Relevant to my interests: http://www.webmd.com/multiple-sclerosis/news/20110328/medical-marijuana-may-impair-thinking-of-ms-patients

    Perhaps to others’. I support drug legalization, but I’m against just marijuana legalization. Just legalizing weed doesn’t fix the problems that accompany the War on Drugs.

    As for the buses, I’d love to ride one to work. I would if it didn’t take an hour twenty on the bus, followed by a forty minute walk. It takes twenty minutes to drive. Oh well. :-/

  • Jim | April 20, 11 @ 2:33 pm

    I’m a little disappointed at the opening portion of this article. Is AltDaily a local newspaper or is it a platform for a select few (liberal) writers to shout down those with opposing views?

    Why are we even debating guns because of something that happened in Texas? Why is this the opener today? Why aren’t we talking about the weather’s effect on the crops…in our region? Or the article about local/HRT transportation…first? Why is pot even on the table anymore? That’s a national issue, not a local one. (And we can all see where that one’s going.)

    With so many exciting, positive things to discuss in our community, why are we taking steps backwards toward issues nobody will budge on? So we can beat each other’s brains out over issues none of us have any influence over? (Unless you or the other posters are congressmen, senators, our president, or more importantly, the head of a large well-funded lobbyist group that can influence someone’s chances at reelection.)

    Why don’t you discuss what our representatives voted for on these issues so that we can actually call them and make an informed rant (potentially in line with the AltDaily liberalism agenda!).

    Or we can all meet in the park and bring clubs and pitchforks (no guns!) and have the same retarded religious-emotion vs freedom-emotion debate over abortion/guns/etc. Everyone that’s ever had that debate has left feeling really fulfilled, right?

    • Amber.Day | April 20, 11 @ 8:05 pm

      It’s because, Jim, they don’t pay their writers to focus on local issues. In fact they don’t pay them at all, this is a volunteer based publication. Money equals incentive to streamline ideas. Anyone with a passion for writing, who isn’t getting compensated for their content, and has a loosely based outline for what they need to put out is most likely just going to write about what’s on their mind. That’s what bloggers do, journalists get paid.

    • Anonymous | April 21, 11 @ 8:50 am

      Why do we need to limit ‘local’ to within our cities, state, or region? Everything JesiO mentioned is occurring solely within the United States; from a certain perspective, that’s keeping things very local.

      Also, if we read solely about issues that affected Hampton Roads and only Hampton Roads on AltDaily, they’d be derided for lack of scope.

      And to respond to JesiO’s writing itself: I’m really lucky that HRT runs a line that stops right outside my house, and again right outside my office. I ride the bus every day. I think it’s awesome. And I don’t think there was much danger of my going to Envy anyway, but now I have a reason to actively avoid it.

      Many, many bloggers get paid. Many, many journalists do not.

      ^_^

    • SC | April 21, 11 @ 9:54 am

      Why? Because local opinions about national issues matter. Also it’s called “If You Read the Paper” not “If You Read the Local News.”

  • Jim | April 22, 11 @ 10:09 am

    I can read national and global news anywhere – it’s called “news.google.com”. What I (now, rarely) come to AltDaily for is what they (supposedly) started as – a taste of local.

    Is it OK that the writing sucks if the writers aren’t paid? Wouldn’t it be nice if that were actually a legitimate argument?

    Open discussion is fine…but if this site is legitimately devoted to the area, they’d promote the positive discussion that we don’t already have, not just the opportunity to revisit old worn over arguments. That’s simply a waste of time that erects barriers to progress by dividing debaters.

    And to SC…if the writing reflected the style, it wouldn’t be “If You Read the News”, it would be “If you read the news with all the pessimism and partisan media-mongering you can muster”.

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

ABOUT THE WRITER
jESiO (jesi owens) has been involved with AltDaily since 2009 and has done a variety of things for the site and community during that time. Memorable events include creating SPIN (Street Performing in Norfolk) and bringing busking to the streets of Norfolk, working on bettering the local music scene any way she can, throwing The Rise Up concert at Attucks Theater, and contributing to If You Read the Paper. She at times writes, shoots photography, edits, plans events, and makes homemade lattes for Hannah. jESiO works for Airbnb.com, makes soap, digs yoga, and piddles with her art/music blog jesiowastaken.blogspot.com.
Other posts by .