Thursday, April 15, 2010
40 Characters or Less Library of Congress
Words Liz McClendon
Thursday, April 15th, 2010 at 7:30 am
You know that phrase that’s always thrown around: “this will go down in the history books. . .” etc.?
Well naturally, it’s starting to look like the change in how (and what) we read and how we get our news is also starting to shape the way we’ll record it. Both the Library of Congress and Twitter announced yesterday on their blogs that The Library of Congress will be acquiring the entire Twitter archive for historical reference. With over 50 million tweets a day, after all, some of those are bound to be important, right?
Like this gem:

Now, of course while they have access to the whole archive, only “significant digital content” will be recorded with help from the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program, which is currently working on a strategy to sort through and preserve that digital data. Matt Raymond, who posted yesterday on behalf of the Library, gave examples of the kinds of tweets to be included:
“. . .the first-ever tweet from Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, President Obama’s tweet about winning the 2008 election, and a set of two tweets from a photojournalist who was arrested in Egypt and then freed because of a series of events set into motion by his use of Twitter.”
It’ll be interesting to see what they classify as truly “significant” or “important” information. Who can say that someday Justin Bieber won’t be historically relevant?

More people would have read this if it had been in status update-speak.
Anyway, it seems like they’ll be archiving mostly political tweets when it comes down to it. They’ve done this sort of web-collecting before and it mostly consists of blogs by political figures, legal articles, and content posted by Congressional Members. Raymond said in his post that The Library has been “collecting materials from the web since it began harvesting congressional and presidential campaign websites in 2000,” and that they now hold over 167 terabytes of strictly web-based content. If you’re wondering how many bytes that is, it’s 1,000,000,000,000 bytes, or 1000 gigabytes – that’s a lot. I mean, it’s nothing compared to what Google has, but it’s a lot.
Biz Stone from Twitter posted an announcement with additional information on the official blog yesterday as well:
“The open exchange of information can have a positive global impact. This is something we firmly believe and it has driven many of our decisions regarding openness. Today we are also excited to share the news that Google has created a wonderful new way to revisit tweets related to historic events. They call it Google Replay because it lets you relive a real time search from specific moments in time.”
I’m all for positive global impact, and over time I think this real-time content, once sorted through, will be a pretty comprehensive timeline of where we’ve gone socially.
So tweet carefully friends. You just might be making history. But honestly, I’ve seen some of your tweets . . . and yeah, probably not (sorry).
COMMENTS
Facebook comments:
ABOUT THE WRITER
A two-time graduate of Virginia Tech, Liz McClendon left the mountains to live below sea-level again and now transitions between writing, making music, and sewing with the changes of each season.
Other posts by Liz McClendon.
Other posts by Liz McClendon.
RELATED POSTS
- Cyclist Gazette: Norfolk Scores Big on the Fixie Index
- Snapshots & Sketches: Walt Taylor’s Wondrous World
- PhotoBlog | For the Love of Cities: Pictures from Near the Top of the Wells Fargo
- Wednesday Morning Triflin’: Ronald Jenkees, Watch it Grandma, POPTARTS, Tell e’m GloZell…
- Norfolk *Will Be* a Bike Friendly City: 3 Reasons to Believe










People are suckers for nostalgia. 4 years worth of 140 character headliners at 50 million a day. I know I’ll be contributing to that archive my share of quality time spent on the porcelain throne regretting that last shot of whiskey; but then I’d need to register a twitter account.
this is crazzzy. im sending this to alex for her mom we were jsut having a similar discussion! …the reprocussions of non-hard copy access. interesting interesting. nice job liz!